Agenda for PC Meeting 1st March 2021

The meeting will commence with a presentation on the Devizes Gateway station project from Tamara Reay and Catharine Symington representing Devizes Development Partnership.

  1. Apologies
  2. Declarations of interest
  3. Formal complaint to Stert Parish Council
  4. Minutes of previous meeting
  5. Treasurers report 
  6. A342 speed limit progress
  7. Devizes local plan
  8. Works needed to repair bridge subsidence over stream
  9. A342 needs remedial works to potholes near recycling centre
  10. Reopening of church scheduled May 17.
  11. Local Covid review
  12. Census 2021
  13. Cancer Research Car boot sale rescheduled to Saturday September 11
  14. Future events
  15. AOB
  16. Date of next meeting

This meeting will be recorded

2021 Census

Please refer to attached document fro Wiltshire Council giving information about the 2021 Census which will take place from 21st March.

PC Meeting 18th January 2021

This is to advise that because of lockdown we have postponed our next PC meeting from Jan 18 until Feb 22.
We intend to hold this meeting virtually by Zoom. More details about this will be published later.

BUDGET 2020/21

Minutes of Meeting of Stert PC, 14th December 2020

MINUTES OF MEETING OF STERT PARISH COUNCIL  held in Stert House on 14th December 2020  

Present:    

  • Clive Boyes (CB) Chairman
  • Alick Edwards (AE) Dty Chairman
  • Ann Harris (AH) Councillor
  • Lucy Barker (LB)  Councillor/Treasurer 
  • William Howkins (WH) Councillor/Clerk

The meeting was held in Stert House with councillors observing social distancing.

  1. Apologies for absence  

Chris Lawrence and Wiltshire Councillor Philip Whitehead sent their apologies.

  1. Declaration of Interest  

There were no declarations of interest.  

  1. Minutes of previous meeting

The minutes of the previous meeting were approved (proposed by LB and seconded by AH) and signed by the chairman.

  1. Treasurer’s report

LB reported that there had been one item of expenditure since the last meeting: £350 to Alick Edwards for village maintenance, as agreed at our previous meeting. Alick was thanked for his hard work throughout the year.

The balance now stands at £3,193.98, confirmed by WH in the passbook.

  1. Precept for FY 2021/22

LB presented a spreadsheet showing the income and expenditure for FY2019/20 and FY2020/21 to date compared with the budgeted amount of expenditure. The spreadsheet also showed her proposed budget for FY 2021/22 and can be seen on the Parish website www.stertparish.com

It was agreed to reduce the precept for the coming year from £1,800 to £1,500 now that the payment to WC for the implementation of the A342 speed limit had been covered in the current year’s budget. The 2021/22 budget, totalling £1,140, included an increase in allowance for village maintenance from £350 to £400 as agreed at the previous meeting. It was also agreed to increase the sum set aside for Stert PC’s annual party from £250 to £350. 

  1. Stert PC party

The PC regrets that it had to cancel its traditional Christmas party this year due to the Covid 19 restrictions. However, it is hoped that it will be able to hold a summer party in 2021 instead. CB kindly offered to host this party in his garden at Stert House. The date and arrangements for the party will be discussed at later meetings.

  1. A342 Speed limit

The latest CATG meeting was scheduled for 15th December. In the published meeting notes, it was stated that “Stert PC had increased their contribution from £500 to £1,000, which for a parish of that size is a large amount. RG to check this is correct. Proposed to approve the work.” LB had sent an email to Richard Gamble on 8th November clarifying that Stert PC had paid £500 towards the cost of the speed survey and had offered a further £500 towards the cost of implementation, totalling in all £1,000. This email was forwarded again to RG by WH on 23rd November.

It was noted that John Ericsson had sent an email to WH thanking the PC for its efforts in getting the speed limit approved.

  1. Reopening the church

CB reported that the repairs to the fallen plaster in the ceiling had been completed by Ady Knapp who did the work for free. This gesture was much appreciated. The church would open for the service on Christmas Day, but with number restricted to about 30.

  1. Land at Stert

WH reported he had written to Lucy Rutter (LR) (WC’s planning officer for this application), raising some of the queries sent in by Stert residents. The following is a summary of the queries and LR’s answers.

Q: The Elderfields appear to be living on site in a mobile home. How long are they permitted to do so? LR: The siting of a mobile home for use by the Elderfields is permitted during construction of the barn and stable providing they are carrying out the works themselves. The planning enforcement team have already investigated this and have raised no concerns.

LR advised separately that ‘this would become an enforcement issue if the mobile unit were to remain on site post construction.’

Q: They have moved in a shed with a bright orange roof used for temporary stables. The PC has received complaints about this eyesore that can be seen from several properties in the village. Can they be required to remove this shed when the new stables is completed?  LR: As far as I am aware the equestrian use does not benefit from any permitted development. It is difficult for me to comment on this as it was not on site during my site visit and I have no plans, location or dimensions to comment on. If there is concern that this has been erected unlawfully I would advise the matter be raised with the planning enforcement team.

Q: The Elderfields have brought in a number of pigs which may have been set out on the equestrian land. Are there any constraints to pig farming on this land near the village which will be affected by the stink? LR: I believe keeping pigs comes under the agricultural use of the and, as such the pigs should not be kept on the land recently changed to equestrian use, however I am seeking further advice on this matter.

Q: The erection of the stables is pending an archeological review. When will this be completed?  LR: This will be entirely dependant on when the applicant decides to commence works. The condition requires Archaeological investigation prior to ground works taking place. The applicants will need to submit an application to discharge the condition when they are ready to (start work).

Q: The erection of the stables is also conditional on approval of a construction management plan by WC. Who will be responsible for monitoring compliance? Can Stert PC receive a copy of this plan? How can WC ensure that the new barn is not used for storage of heavy agricultural machinery used for outside contracting purposes? LR: Unfortunately WC does not have the capacity to police compliance with every condition or application made. The applicant will need to submit an application to discharge this condition. Generally these are not part of a public consultation process, the highways department will consider whether the management plan is acceptable, the applications will need to adhere to the plan and be mindful that enforcement could come to check on compliance.

The PC agreed to seek a meeting with LR to resolve some of the queries not answered by LR’s email and other issues raised by residents such as the deterioration of the verges down the lane caused by the heavy traffic, the use of a generator to supply power to their mobile home, the building waste used as hardcore on the site, the damage already done to the clearing of undergrowth designated as “priority woodland habitat” by Defra. Concern was raised by several residents that WC did not carry out an ecology survey prior to granting APD approval of the barn.

One resident has asked if it is permitted to graze horses on agricultural land which has not been granted equestrian change of use. Research by the PC indicates that horses can be grazed on agricultural land as long as they are not being supplementary fed, ridden or lunged on that land, unless that use is for 28 days or less per year.

  1. AOB

10.1. AH had contacted Philippa Hatlapa offering her help with setting up a defibrillator in Stert, but hadn’t heard back from Philippa. She is ready to offer advice at any time.

10.2  AE warned that there had been reports of dog-nappers in the area who were on the look out for pedigree dogs to steal. AH had heard of a woman seen locally knocking on the front door while her accomplice went round to try to gain entry via the back door. 

10.3 CB had applied for approval to fell an ash tree in his garden that was suffering from ash die-back. This was agreed.

10.4  The PC presented a case of wine to CB on the occasion of his 80th birthday on 15th December. WH expressed the PC’s appreciation of the many years of service he had given the village and the wisdom which he brought to the PC’s deliberations  in carrying out these duties.   

  1. Date of next meeting

The next meeting was scheduled for 18th January 2021.

Agenda for PC meeting, 14th December 2020

Agenda for Meeting of Stert P.C to be held at Stert House on Monday 14 Dec at 6.30 pm

1. Apologies

2. Declarations of Interest

3. Minutes of previous meeting

4.Treasurers report

5.Precept for 2021/2022

6. Stert PC annual party

7. A342 Speed limit 

8. Reopening of Church

9. Land at Stert

10. AOB

11. Date of next meeting

This meeting is being organised in line with Government Social distancing and Lockdown requirements.

Please would members of the public who wish to comment on this Agenda please advise the Parish Treasurer by email to lucybarker23@hotmail.com       

by Monday 14 December 12.00pm.

Minutes of Special Meeting of Stert PC, 30th October 2020

MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STERT PARISH COUNCIL  

held in Stert House on 30th October 2020  

Present:    

  • Clive Boyes (CB), Chairman
  • Alick Edwards (AE), Dty Chairman
  • Chris Lawrence (CL). Councillor
  • Ann Harris (AH), Councillor
  • Lucy Barker (LB),  Councillor/Treasurer 
  • William Howkins (WH), Councillor/Clerk

The meeting was held in Stert House with councillors observing social distancing.

This Special Meeting was convened to agree the PC’s response to Planning Application 20/08044 for the change in use of part of the land purchased by the Elderfields south of Stert from agricultural to equestrian and for the erection of a stables building. 

  1. Apologies for absence  

There were no apologies.

  1. Declaration of Interest  

There were no declarations of interest.  

  1. Planning application 20/08044

LB presented the results of the email survey conducted on 27th to 30th October. Of the 46 people who had expressed an opinion, 41 objected to the application, 5 had no opinion and there were no supporters. 37 objected due to increased traffic down the narrow lane, 19 were concerned that the change in use would lead to further commercialisation, 15 were concerned about damage to the ecology and light pollution and 13 objected due to the lack of services (power and water). 

The PC voted unanimously to uphold the views of the village by objecting to the planning application.

The following response to WC was agreed at the meeting:

Stert PC objects to the application. The PC conducted an email survey of the entire village and there was a high response:

  • 41 residents considered the PC should object.
  • 5 had no opinion.
  • No-one supported the application.

The PC is unanimous in upholding the views of the residents.

The principal objections, which reflect the views of the village, are as follows:

1. TRAFFIC. The access road is shared with walkers and horse riders on the Wessex Ridgeway. It is steep and narrow in places and will be under more pressure from the heavy traffic arising from the agricultural machinery contracting business from the barn under construction on the site, see 20/05021/APD and see www.meagri.co.uk

In addition, the applicants stated at a village meeting that they plan to run an equestrian business from the site (buying and selling event horses), this must necessarily generate even further heavy traffic and the village road infrastructure is unable to cope with this. 

In particular:

  • The turning from the A342 in and out of the village is dangerous for heavy agricultural equipment and horse boxes.
  • The acute angled turning by Fullaway Cottage is too sharp for heavy vehicles, especially tractors and trailers which endanger Fullaway Cottage and walkers and horse riders.
  • The lane on the slope leading down towards the site is narrow without passing places. The tarmac surface is too weak for heavy traffic.

Access to the site should be assessed by the Highways department.

2.  NO VIABLE SUSTAINABLE FARMING ENTERPRISE at the site, contrary to what the applicants state. The applicants state that they wish to have the horses in close proximity to the farm whilst they are working on the land.  However, this is misleading since the land remaining for agricultural purposes will only be 6 hectares (15 acres), made up of pasture land which hardly constitutes a viable and sustainable farming enterprise.  There are no welfare facilities on site for working the farm for this extended length of time.  It is obvious to many residents that the addition of horses to the site will only lead to a future application for a permanent dwelling on the land – which the application makes no mention of, but was disclosed as an objective at a village meeting with the applicants on 7th Sept.

3. NO SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY OF WATER AND ELECTRICITY. Horses need both.The application makes no reference to how services/utilities to the land will be achieved for the welfare of horses, other livestock and those working on the land.  There are real concerns regarding the use of generators and the noise pollution these create, along with the transporting of water bowsers to the site.

4. ECOLOGY. The clearing of the adjacent copse (during the nesting season) to facilitate the construction of 20/05021/APD has already put severe pressure on the wildlife and general ecology of the area. The building of the stables will exacerbate the problem and increase the light pollution to the detriment of the barn owls and bats frequently spotted here. A full environmental survey is required.

5. NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OPEN COUNTRYSIDE. As mentioned above the applicants seek to run 2 businesses from the site.There is concern about possible future development of expanded equestrian business activities, which change of use would permit. The PC sees this as overdevelopment of the natural landscape.

To conclude, there is some concern amongst the village that the planning application does not fully reflect the intentions of the applicants.

CB reported that he had received an email from Katie Elderfield requesting copies of all the emails sent in by residents, However, the PC agreed that it should treat these responses as confidential. Those who wished their views to be made public would be encouraged to post their views on WC’s planning website. The PC was of the opinion that by posting these minutes on the notice boards and website it had fully disclosed the results of the survey.

Redhorn News, November 2020

Redhorn News, October 2020

October 2020 single pages digital

Minutes of Annual PC Meeting, 7th September 2020

Minutes of Annual Meeting held in Stert House on 7th September 2020  

Present:    

  • Clive Boyes (CB), Chairman
  • Chris Lawrence (CL), Councillor
  • Ann Harris (AH), Councillor
  • Lucy Barker (LB),  Councillor/Treasurer 
  • William Howkins (WH), Councillor/Clerk

The meeting was held in Stert House with councillors observing social distancing.

  1. Apologies for absence  

Alick Edwards sent his apologies.

  1. Declaration of Interest  

There were no declarations of interest.  

  1. Minutes of previous meeting

The minutes of the previous meeting, held on 13th July 2020, were approved (proposed by LB and seconded by CL) and signed by the Chairman.

  1. Treasurer’s Report

LB reported that there had been one item of expenditure since the last meeting: £59.94, the usual gift (6 bottles of wine) for our internal auditor, Neville Burrell. This amount is slightly over our budgeted figure. The account  had received interest of £1.39 and a £25 donation for use of the village marquee.

The balance stands at £3,543.98, confirmed by WH in the pass book.

It’s the time of the year when the PC thanks Alick Edwards for the maintenance work he does around the village, cutting the verges, trimming hedges etc. It was agreed to pay him £350, an increase on the £300 we’ve been paying for nearly 10 years. This amount will increase to £400 in the year 2021/2. The PC sees no need to seek alternative quotes as the PC has always felt that AE gives very good value for money and there are many advantages in having maintenance done by a village resident who is able to respond very quickly, if necessary.

At the next PC meeting in December we will need to agree the precept for 2021/2, for which the treasurer needs to prepare a budget. It would be helpful if councillors could advise the treasurer in advance of any possible extraordinary expenses in both this and the next financial year.

  1. Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman

The PC unanimously thanked CB for his service as Chairman during the past year. WH proposed and CL seconded that he be asked to stand again as Chairman for the coming year, to which he agreed. He was duly elected. CB said that he had received confirmation that Alick Edwards was happy to continue as Vice Chairman. His tenure for the coming year was proposed by LB and seconded by AH and he was duly elected.

  1. Stert Website

WH reported that on 4th August he had sent an email to all Stert residents on the mailing list asking them whether they thought it was justified hiring specialist IT help to make our website conform to the new government accessibility regulations or whether they considered this to be “disproportionate burden” for our small community.  He had received replies from 25 residents all of whom opposed making any changes to the current website. WH had therefore prepared the required accessibility statement claiming disproportionate burden and had posted this on the website. He had emailed NALC’s Katie Fielding asking her to confirm that this would satisfy government regulations. and, in her reply, she appeared to do so. 

The PC offered a special vote of thanks to WH for his work on this.

  1. A342 Speed limit

CB reported that he had spoken earlier that day to Wiltshire Councillor Philip Whitehead (PW) about implementation of the speed limit. He said that if CB could confirm that the PC would pay £500 towards the cost of implementation, then he would advise Richard Gamble, Chairman of Devizes CATG, to recommend its approval. CB had sent PW an email to confirm that the PC was ready to make this final payment in addition to the £500 it had already paid for the speed survey. AH said that residents of the Clock Inn Park read the PC’s minutes posted on their notice board and noted the references made to progress with the speed limit.

  1. Closure of the Church

CB said that the congregation was not in favour of opening the church under the present government regulations. However, they hoped to be able to open the church by mid October in time to celebrate harvest festival. He thanked LB for her initiative with her roadside plant sale which had now raised almost £600.

  1. Lockdown review

AH said that Clock Inn residents were still staying at home. Col. Bob Fram of Valley View had very kindly been collecting prescriptions for residents since the beginning of lock-down. She reported that one resident, Gary Speck, had regretfully died recently of respiratory problems, possibly infected by Covid 19.

  1. AOB

10.1 LB, Philip Normington and two volunteers from Urchfont had cleared the bramble growth over the footpath to Urchfont over the railway embankment. She suggested that walkers to take a pair a secateurs with them on their walks to snip off encroaching growth.

10.2. The PC’s Christmas party was set for Friday 18th December.

  1. Next Meeting

The next PC meeting is scheduled to be held in Stert House on Monday 14th December 2020, at 6.30 pm.